Verification record — version 5
Word of Clout self-audit procedure
Self-audit record — Word of Clout’s own verification procedure, stated and signed. It asserts nothing about any practitioner; it is the audit of our own work.
This record states and signs Word of Clout's own sampling procedure: the frame, the draw, the retained ids, the error definition, the procedure faults, and the bound. It is an audit of our own verification work — it asserts nothing about any practitioner. Read the bound as what it is: an upper limit on our own re-derivation error, not a score of any source, any plan, or any provider.
The self-audit procedure — stated and signed
Other findings
The published receipt (sample-audit-n50-20260907T043637Z.out, sha256 4a763180b1aa2c92dc48cdd49f8016d0ac079846f8823e8f869aa5970497e83b) records 50 distinct verification ids: 42 board and 8 NPI. Under PROCEDURE-FAULT-1 v2 re-parse, 49 rows have expected == actual (agree); 1 row (row 13) carries a not-rederivable marker. Retained as published ledger extract at /verify/self-audit/2026-09-06T200705434Z/ledger/ (20/20 SHA256SUMS-verified) and /verify/self-audit/2026-09-07T043637637Z/ledger/ (50/50 SHA256SUMS-verified). Runner published at /verify/self-audit/observation-extract-runner.mjs re-derives 49/50 agree + 1 NOT-REDERIVED (ver:board:mo-dental:2025005314:address_of_record:2026-09-04@old, PROCEDURE-FAULT-1 v2 rule-short-circuit).
Source: operator run receipt · observed Sep 22, 2026 04:27 UTC · rely until Dec 06, 2026 04:36 UTC (POLICY basis) · evidence
cannot establish — The frame is every verification row recorded in the Word Of Clout published-records store at cutoff 2026-09-07T04:36:37.637Z. The frame row count is not recorded in the run receipt; the frame hash at the cutoff was not captured.
Source: @4 narrowing · observed — · evidence
cannot establish — The draw used MongoDB's server-side $sample aggregate (sample_audit.js:91) against the frame. The sampler source that ran (sampler 51b81d94, sample_audit.js sha256 51fdb0dd3568cbe8faba3798a86428d341f66b052221fc9daf0075416333827d) is published at /verify/self-audit/sample_audit.js so the method can be inspected; no seed was recorded in the receipt, so the draw cannot be reproduced.
Source: @4 narrowing · observed — · evidence
Row 13 (ver:board:mo-dental:2025005314:address_of_record:2026-09-04@old) fault class NOT-REDERIVED / sub-cause rule-short-circuit - this is a RETROSPECTIVE classification assigned from the receipt marker and the sampler source, not an emission of the run itself.
Source: @4 narrowing - the classification is a later labeling, not a run emission · observed Sep 22, 2026 04:27 UTC · rely until Dec 06, 2026 04:36 UTC (POLICY basis) · evidence
0 disagreements in 49 re-derived rows; the exact one-sided 95% binomial upper bound on the frame error rate among re-derivable verification rows is 1 - 0.05^(1/49) = 5.93% approx 5.9%, conditional on the run design above (the 50 rows are the ones in the receipt; the frame, the draw, and the re-derivation for the fault row cannot be independently established for this run). The retained re-derivable artifact is the ledger extract at /verify/self-audit/2026-09-07T043637637Z/ledger/ with SHA256SUMS and the observation-extract-runner.mjs published beside it.
Source: @4 narrowing · observed Sep 22, 2026 04:27 UTC · rely until Dec 06, 2026 04:36 UTC (POLICY basis) · evidence
2 published receipts: 951d0480bd92f162bf21986134e86f48ac3dbe47b37934b9a486042d50a0b776 published at /verify/self-audit/sample-audit-20260906T200704Z.out; 4a763180b1aa2c92dc48cdd49f8016d0ac079846f8823e8f869aa5970497e83b published at /verify/self-audit/sample-audit-n50-20260907T043637Z.out.
Source: @4 narrowing · observed Sep 22, 2026 04:27 UTC · rely until Dec 06, 2026 04:36 UTC (POLICY basis) · evidence
Technical section — signed and recorded material shown verbatim
Per-proposition provenance — verbatim from the record
receipt observable · VERIFIED
verification: —
artifact cited: —
evidence route: /verify/sample-audit
observation: OBSERVED
authority: operator run receipt
comparison rule: operator run receipt · freshness policy: unmeasured
applicable rule: POLICY
frame unverifiable · UNVERIFIABLE
verification: —
artifact cited: —
no evidence route is published for this proposition — see missing precondition
observation:
authority: @4 narrowing (R15-2(d))
applicable rule: N/A
draw unverifiable · UNVERIFIABLE
verification: —
artifact cited: —
no evidence route is published for this proposition — see missing precondition
observation:
authority: @4 narrowing (R15-2(d))
applicable rule: N/A
fault classification · VERIFIED
verification: —
artifact cited: —
evidence route: /verify/sample-audit#fault-row-13
observation: OBSERVED
authority: @4 narrowing - the classification is a later labeling, not a run emission
comparison rule: @4 narrowing - the classification is a later labeling, not a run emission · freshness policy: unmeasured
applicable rule: POLICY
bound conditional · VERIFIED
verification: —
artifact cited: —
evidence route: /verify/sample-audit#bound-section
observation: OBSERVED
authority: @4 narrowing
comparison rule: @4 narrowing · freshness policy: unmeasured
applicable rule: POLICY
run inventory · VERIFIED
verification: —
artifact cited: —
evidence route: /verify/sample-audit
observation: OBSERVED
authority: @4 narrowing
comparison rule: @4 narrowing · freshness policy: unmeasured
applicable rule: POLICY
run completeness · UNVERIFIABLE
verification: —
artifact cited: —
evidence route: /verify/sample-audit
observation:
authority: @4 narrowing (R15-2(d))
applicable rule: N/A
Record id
sample-audit-current@5
Read from the records ledger at request time
Verified at
Sep 22, 2026 04:27 UTC
when the supporting evidence was captured
Method
recount of the published receipt; ledger extract published at /verify/self-audit/2026-09-07T043637637Z/ledger/ with SHA256SUMS; re-derivation runner at /verify/self-audit/observation-extract-runner.mjs
method read from the record’s own proposition method field — never a hardcoded summary
Historical verify
Sep 22, 2026 04:27 UTC
when this was last verified
Earliest recheck deadline
Dec 06, 2026 04:36 UTC
the earliest re-check deadline across this record’s propositions — no whole-record reliance state exists; each proposition’s reliance stands on its own card
Recheck basis
POLICY
the re-check basis of the earliest deadline, quoted from the record's own signed next_required_by_source field — the signed record is the only source of a recheck date
Public key
Ed25519 (SPKI) — shown in full below
embedded in this record
Signed scope — machine-replayable field enumeration; the sentences state their meaning
The signature covers exactly: id, schema, subject, created_at (the EVIDENCE CUTOFF — the newest evidence timestamp in the derived snapshot, NOT the issuance time), issued_at (the issuance time of THIS record, distinct from the evidence cutoff — a record can never acquire an earlier issuance time because its evidence is older), public_key, propositions (four-state verdicts only, POLICY next_required_by = min(90d interval, authority-stated expiry at 00:00 America/Chicago)), candidate_relations (evidence joins carrying no verdict), dependency_manifest, dependency_manifest_sha256, signed_scope_note, supersedes — every field except signature, signing, and derivation. The derivation block (the queries that produced this record) is display metadata, excluded from signing. dependency_manifest_sha256 is the SHA-256 hex of the canonical form of dependency_manifest (key-sorted, no whitespace) — the same recipe as this record's own canonical form (equal manifest values hash equally regardless of stored key order). The field names in this note are the signed field names — machine-replayable values, labeled as such; the sentences around them state their meaning.
Signature
sha256:d667ac718451f5aa… Ed25519
re-computed at this render
-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----
MCowBQYDK2VwAyEAZAXc8TrIl05HTq4oDHbsc2Qf8SA6pydv3jbaUV4kSyA=
-----END PUBLIC KEY-----
How this record was derived — its provenance, repeat it yourself
This record was derived from the published self-audit run receipt at /verify/self-audit/sample-audit-n50-20260907T043637Z.out (sha256 4a763180b1aa2c92dc48cdd49f8016d0ac079846f8823e8f869aa5970497e83b). The ids_artifact path is the PUBLIC URL. Supersedes sample-audit-current@4 per the chain law; the successor cures the predecessor's internal-vocabulary leaks by construction — every field re-stated clean. Filed per the review register citation R15-2(d) (the @4 subject defect: the signed subject carried a register id; this successor states the subject clean and carries the citation here, in display metadata excluded from signing).
machine-replayable (structured query values for automated re-derivation; technical names, not prose — rendered to a reader only as a labeled machine block)
read the published receipt at /verify/self-audit/sample-audit-n50-20260907T043637Z.out (sha256 4a763180b1aa2c92dc48cdd49f8016d0ac079846f8823e8f869aa5970497e83b)
re-parse under PROCEDURE-FAULT-1: outcome not_rederivable OR (expected not-rederivable-false AND actual false) → procedure fault, excluded from n
bound = 1 − 0.05^(1/49)
self-audit-run:2026-09-07T04:36:37.637Z · sha256:4a763180b1aa2c92… · fetched Sep 07, 2026 04:36 UTC by the WoC operator, browser
Superseded history — a preview-key-signed sample of this record exists, bytes preserved, at the labeled preview path /verify/preview/sample-audit-preview-20260907.json — not production assurance, not linked from this record; see the current self-audit record
Verify this yourself — three independent checks
Material class: self_audit — this record audits Word of Clout's own procedure. It asserts nothing about any practitioner.
This is the record's canonical form. Ed25519 signature verification runs in your browser using a pure-JS implementation — no browser fallback, no SHA-256-only digest comparison passing as verification. Nothing is sent to us.
{"dependency_manifest":{"evaluation_cutoff":"2026-09-22T04:27:00.000Z","receipt":{"bytes":14731,"citation":"/verify/self-audit/sample-audit-n50-20260907T043637Z.out","name":"sample-audit-n50-20260907T043637Z.out","sha256":"4a763180b1aa2c92dc48cdd49f8016d0ac079846f8823e8f869aa5970497e83b"},"ruleset_version":"woc.records.ruleset.self-audit.v1"},"dependency_manifest_sha256":"960f6729efc681ab82418bb42ef747b0bf33103eca51b3213cb1a8a5066923c0","id":"sample-audit-current@5","issued_at":"2026-09-23T20:28:37.359Z","material_class":"self_audit","propositions":[{"authority":"operator run receipt","decay_class":"unmeasured","evidence_class":"receipt_observable","id":"self-audit:receipt_observable","method":"recount of the published receipt; ledger extract published at /verify/self-audit/2026-09-07T043637637Z/ledger/ with SHA256SUMS; re-derivation runner at /verify/self-audit/observation-extract-runner.mjs","next_required_by":"2026-12-06T04:36:37.637Z","proposition":"The published receipt (sample-audit-n50-20260907T043637Z.out, sha256 4a763180b1aa2c92dc48cdd49f8016d0ac079846f8823e8f869aa5970497e83b) records 50 distinct verification ids: 42 board and 8 NPI. Under PROCEDURE-FAULT-1 v2 re-parse, 49 rows have expected == actual (agree); 1 row (row 13) carries a not-rederivable marker. Retained as published ledger extract at /verify/self-audit/2026-09-06T200705434Z/ledger/ (20/20 SHA256SUMS-verified) and /verify/self-audit/2026-09-07T043637637Z/ledger/ (50/50 SHA256SUMS-verified). Runner published at /verify/self-audit/observation-extract-runner.mjs re-derives 49/50 agree + 1 NOT-REDERIVED (ver:board:mo-dental:2025005314:address_of_record:2026-09-04@old, PROCEDURE-FAULT-1 v2 rule-short-circuit).","provenance":{"next_required_by_source":"POLICY","verified_at_source":"OBSERVED"},"state":"VERIFIED","verified_at":"2026-09-22T04:27:00.000Z"},{"authority":"@4 narrowing (R15-2(d))","evidence_class":"run_design","id":"self-audit:frame_unverifiable","method":"UNVERIFIABLE - missing precondition: frame count/hash at cutoff not recorded","missing_precondition":"frame count/hash at cutoff not recorded","next_admissible_step":"a successor run that records the frame row count and frame hash at the cutoff","proposition":"The frame is every verification row recorded in the Word Of Clout published-records store at cutoff 2026-09-07T04:36:37.637Z. The frame row count is not recorded in the run receipt; the frame hash at the cutoff was not captured.","provenance":{"next_required_by_source":"N/A"},"state":"UNVERIFIABLE"},{"authority":"@4 narrowing (R15-2(d))","evidence_class":"run_design","id":"self-audit:draw_unverifiable","method":"UNVERIFIABLE - missing precondition: no seed recorded; the draw cannot be reproduced (DRAW-REPRODUCIBLE-1 is the next admissible step)","missing_precondition":"no seed recorded; the draw cannot be reproduced (DRAW-REPRODUCIBLE-1 is the next admissible step)","next_admissible_step":"DRAW-REPRODUCIBLE-1 — a successor run that records the seed, the RNG, and the draw algorithm in the receipt","proposition":"The draw used MongoDB's server-side $sample aggregate (sample_audit.js:91) against the frame. The sampler source that ran (sampler 51b81d94, sample_audit.js sha256 51fdb0dd3568cbe8faba3798a86428d341f66b052221fc9daf0075416333827d) is published at /verify/self-audit/sample_audit.js so the method can be inspected; no seed was recorded in the receipt, so the draw cannot be reproduced.","provenance":{"next_required_by_source":"N/A"},"state":"UNVERIFIABLE"},{"authority":"@4 narrowing - the classification is a later labeling, not a run emission","decay_class":"unmeasured","evidence_class":"retrospective","id":"self-audit:fault_classification","method":"retrospective classification under PROCEDURE-FAULT-1 v2","next_required_by":"2026-12-06T04:36:37.637Z","proposition":"Row 13 (ver:board:mo-dental:2025005314:address_of_record:2026-09-04@old) fault class NOT-REDERIVED / sub-cause rule-short-circuit - this is a RETROSPECTIVE classification assigned from the receipt marker and the sampler source, not an emission of the run itself.","provenance":{"next_required_by_source":"POLICY","verified_at_source":"OBSERVED"},"state":"VERIFIED","verified_at":"2026-09-22T04:27:00.000Z"},{"authority":"@4 narrowing","decay_class":"unmeasured","evidence_class":"receipt_observable","id":"self-audit:bound_conditional","method":"exact binomial one-sided 95% upper bound; ledger extract and runner at /verify/self-audit/ published as retained artifact","next_required_by":"2026-12-06T04:36:37.637Z","proposition":"0 disagreements in 49 re-derived rows; the exact one-sided 95% binomial upper bound on the frame error rate among re-derivable verification rows is 1 - 0.05^(1/49) = 5.93% approx 5.9%, conditional on the run design above (the 50 rows are the ones in the receipt; the frame, the draw, and the re-derivation for the fault row cannot be independently established for this run). The retained re-derivable artifact is the ledger extract at /verify/self-audit/2026-09-07T043637637Z/ledger/ with SHA256SUMS and the observation-extract-runner.mjs published beside it.","provenance":{"next_required_by_source":"POLICY","verified_at_source":"OBSERVED"},"state":"VERIFIED","verified_at":"2026-09-22T04:27:00.000Z"},{"authority":"@4 narrowing","decay_class":"unmeasured","evidence_class":"receipt_observable","id":"self-audit:run_inventory","method":"published receipt catalogue","next_required_by":"2026-12-06T04:36:37.637Z","proposition":"2 published receipts: 951d0480bd92f162bf21986134e86f48ac3dbe47b37934b9a486042d50a0b776 published at /verify/self-audit/sample-audit-20260906T200704Z.out; 4a763180b1aa2c92dc48cdd49f8016d0ac079846f8823e8f869aa5970497e83b published at /verify/self-audit/sample-audit-n50-20260907T043637Z.out.","provenance":{"next_required_by_source":"POLICY","verified_at_source":"OBSERVED"},"state":"VERIFIED","verified_at":"2026-09-22T04:27:00.000Z"},{"authority":"@4 narrowing (R15-2(d))","evidence_class":"run_design","id":"self-audit:run_completeness","method":"UNVERIFIABLE - run completeness rests on WoC host records","missing_precondition":"run completeness rests on WoC host records","next_admissible_step":"RUN-LEDGER-1 — every run appends its receipt hash to the int1-signed host snapshot at run time","proposition":"The published run-inventory records 2 runs; run completeness rests on WoC host records — whether additional runs occurred is not independently verifiable from the published receipts alone.","provenance":{"next_required_by_source":"N/A"},"state":"UNVERIFIABLE"}],"public_key":"-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\nMCowBQYDK2VwAyEAZAXc8TrIl05HTq4oDHbsc2Qf8SA6pydv3jbaUV4kSyA=\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----","record_class":"self_audit","schema":"woc.record.v1","signed_scope_note":"The signature covers exactly: id, schema, subject, created_at (the EVIDENCE CUTOFF — the newest evidence timestamp in the derived snapshot, NOT the issuance time), issued_at (the issuance time of THIS record, distinct from the evidence cutoff — a record can never acquire an earlier issuance time because its evidence is older), public_key, propositions (four-state verdicts only, POLICY next_required_by = min(90d interval, authority-stated expiry at 00:00 America/Chicago)), candidate_relations (evidence joins carrying no verdict), dependency_manifest, dependency_manifest_sha256, signed_scope_note, supersedes — every field except signature, signing, and derivation. The derivation block (the queries that produced this record) is display metadata, excluded from signing. dependency_manifest_sha256 is the SHA-256 hex of the canonical form of dependency_manifest (key-sorted, no whitespace) — the same recipe as this record's own canonical form (equal manifest values hash equally regardless of stored key order). The field names in this note are the signed field names — machine-replayable values, labeled as such; the sentences around them state their meaning.","subject":"Word of Clout self-audit procedure — @5 evidence-class narrowing","supersedes":["sample-audit-current@4"]}
published digest d667ac718451f5aa3b046cb6a291e1ad6ee2901bfee3fb8add855852ac97be20
your browser —
If a published number cannot be re-derived from the ledger with the public key, it is a claim, and the record carrying it is void. That rule binds us before it binds anyone else.